LLumar CTX Vs. ATC: In-Depth Differences

I’m excited to share my experience comparing LLumar CTX and ATC window tints, and you’ll want to choose the best one for your car. 

As a Denver driver facing intense sun, I tested both for comfort and style. 

This article compares their features, pros, cons, and performance to help you decide. 

Whether you’re on a budget or seeking premium cooling, I’ve got you covered. 

Visit a local tint shop—your car will stay cool and sleek!

Comparison Table LLumar CTX Vs. ATC

My Experience with LLumar CTX and ATC

I’m a 35-year-old photographer driving a 2020 Toyota 4Runner in Denver.

Last year, the sun was fading my seats, so I decided to tint my windows.

I started with LLumar ATC at a local shop for $200, choosing 35% VLT.

The install took two hours, and the charcoal tint gave my SUV a sharp look.

Driving to Golden, my cabin felt cooler at 85°F, but glare was still an issue.

My phone and GPS worked fine, and the tint held up for six months.

The catch? It faded slightly and struggled in 95°F heat.

This summer, I switched to LLumar CTX for $450, keeping 35% VLT.

The nano-ceramic film felt high-end, and the install was seamless.

On a 98°F day, my 4Runner was way cooler—CTX’s heat rejection was a game-changer.

Glare was minimal, and nighttime visibility was crisp.

After eight months, it still looks brand new, no fading at all.

The price was steep, but the comfort was worth it.

CTX blew ATC away, but ATC’s low cost was tempting.

About LLumar CTX and ATC

LLumar has been a window film leader since 1977.

ATC, their budget-friendly dyed tint, starts at $150 for a full car.

It’s designed for style and basic UV protection.

CTX, a premium nano-ceramic tint, costs $400-$600.

It’s built for superior heat rejection and durability.

Both are installed by certified shops for top-notch results.

They block 99% UV rays and don’t mess with signals.

ATC is great for casual drivers, while CTX is for performance seekers.

Both come with lifetime warranties for peace of mind.

Key Features of LLumar ATC

LLumar ATC is an affordable dyed film.

It offers 33%-40% total solar energy rejection (TSER).

It blocks 99% UV rays, protecting your interior and skin.

VLT ranges from 5% to 50% with 90% clarity.

Seven charcoal shades balance style and privacy.

Non-metallic design avoids GPS or phone interference.

It’s scratch-resistant but prone to fading.

It’s perfect for budget commuters in mild climates.

The lifetime warranty covers defects.

It’s a solid entry-level tint.

Key Features of LLumar CTX

• LLumar CTX is a nano-ceramic star.
• It delivers 50%-60% TSER and 63% infrared rejection.
• It blocks 99% UV rays, safeguarding upholstery and health.
• VLT spans 5% to 50% with 95% clarity, sharper than ATC.
• Seven charcoal shades offer style and privacy.
• Non-metallic tech keeps signals clear.
• Scratch-resistant and fade-proof, it’s built to last.
• It excels in hot climates and daily drives.
• The lifetime warranty adds confidence.
• It’s premium, made for comfort.

Pros of LLumar ATC:

• Low Cost: At $200, it’s a steal compared to CTX’s $450. I saved a ton.
• 99% UV Protection: My seats didn’t fade. I felt safer from UV rays.
• Stylish Look: Charcoal tint was sleek. I got compliments.
• Decent Clarity: 90% VLT was okay at night. I drove safely.
• No Signal Issues: My GPS and phone worked fine. I stayed connected.
• Some Glare Reduction: 60% cut glare a bit. I squinted less.
• Scratch-Resistant: Held up for six months. It stayed clean.
• Fast Install: Two hours was quick. I was back on the road.
• Privacy Boost: 35% VLT hid my gear. I parked without worry.
• Lifetime Warranty: Covered defects. I felt secure.

Cons of LLumar ATC:

• Poor Heat Rejection: 33%-40% TSER didn’t cool much. I felt 95°F days.
• Fading Issues: Purple tinge after six months. I wasn’t happy.
• Lower Clarity: 90% VLT was hazier than CTX. I noticed at dusk.
• Weak Glare Control: 60% reduction wasn’t great. I squinted in bright sun.
• Less Durable: Fading hurt its look. I wanted it to last longer.
• Not for Hot Climates: Struggled above 90°F. I needed better cooling.
• Basic Film: Dyed tech felt cheap. I wanted CTX’s nano-ceramic.
• Less Privacy: Lighter shades showed my interior at night. I wanted darker.
• No Windshield Tint: Couldn’t tint my windshield legally. I looked elsewhere.
• More AC Use: Weak cooling meant higher fuel costs. I spent extra.

Pros of LLumar CTX:

• Great Heat Rejection: 63% IR and 50%-60% TSER kept my car cool. I used less AC.
• 99% UV Block: Protected my seats and skin. I felt safer.
• High Clarity: 95% VLT was super clear. I saw great at night.
• 80% Glare Reduction: Eased my eyes on sunny days. I drove comfortably.
• Fade-Proof: No color loss after eight months. It looked new.
• Durable Build: Scratch-resistant nano-ceramic. It’s still perfect.
• No Signal Interference: GPS and phone were flawless. I stayed connected.
• Premium Look: Charcoal shade was classy. My 4Runner looked sharp.
• Better Privacy: 35% VLT hid my stuff well. I parked confidently.
• Lifetime Warranty: Covered defects fully. I felt secure.

Cons of LLumar CTX:

• Pricey: $450 was a lot. I could’ve gotten ATC and saved.
• Slight Blue Hue: Seen at 5%-15% VLT. I didn’t like it indoors.
• Longer Install: Three hours felt slow. I wanted it faster.
• Not Budget-Friendly: Too costly for some. I had to budget.
• No Clear Film: Couldn’t tint my windshield legally. I needed another option.
• Dark Tint Limits: 5% VLT may be illegal in some states. I checked laws.
• Overkill for Mild Areas: 63% IR was excessive. I questioned the need.
• Price Range: $400-$600 varied by shop. I shopped around.
• Pro Install Only: No DIY. I couldn’t save money.
• Not the Darkest: 5% VLT wasn’t as stealthy as some films.

Maintenance Tips for Window Tints

• Wait 48 Hours: I kept windows up after install. It let the film cure.
• Use Microfiber: I cleaned with soft cloths. It avoided scratches.
• Avoid Ammonia: I used ammonia-free cleaner. It preserved the film.
• Clean Weekly: I wiped off dust regularly. It kept the tint clear.
• Check Edges: I looked for peeling monthly. It caught issues early.
• Park in Shade: I avoided direct sun when parked. It reduced heat stress.
• Mild Soap: I used dish soap and water. It was gentle.
• Skip Abrasives: I avoided rough sponges. It protected the coating.
• Dry Gently: I patted dry with microfiber. It prevented streaks.
• Annual Check: I visited my shop yearly. It ensured quality.

Heat Rejection Performance

CTX dominates heat rejection.

Its 63% IR and 50%-60% TSER crushed ATC’s 33%-40% TSER.

On a 98°F day, CTX kept my 4Runner 8-10°F cooler than ATC.

ATC was fine at 85°F but couldn’t handle 90°F+.

CTX’s nano-ceramic tech targeted infrared rays better.

I saved fuel with CTX’s lower AC use.

For hot climates like Arizona, CTX is a must.

ATC works for milder areas or tight budgets.

You’ll feel CTX’s cooling edge right away.

Clarity and Visibility

CTX wins for clarity.

Its 95% VLT gave sharper views, especially at night.

ATC’s 90% VLT was okay but hazier in low light.

Both offered clear daytime views at 35% VLT.

I felt safe driving either in rain or fog.

CTX’s minimal haze improved night drives.

ATC had a slight blur at dusk.

For top clarity, CTX is your choice.

ATC is fine for casual drivers.

You’ll see well with both.

Privacy and Aesthetics

CTX has a slight privacy advantage.

Its 35% VLT hid my interior better than ATC’s at night.

ATC’s lighter shades were more visible after dark.

Both use charcoal hues that match factory glass.

Seven shade options gave styling flexibility.

CTX’s nano-ceramic finish looked more premium.

I got more compliments on CTX’s sleek vibe.

For a luxe, private look, CTX wins.

ATC offers a clean, budget style.

You’ll like either’s look.

Durability and Longevity

CTX is far more durable.

Its nano-ceramic film showed no fading after eight months.

ATC’s dyed film faded slightly after six months.

Both have scratch-resistant coatings.

I expect 10-15 years from CTX with care.

ATC may need replacing sooner due to fading.

Lifetime warranties cover defects for both.

I cleaned them with mild soap, and CTX stayed flawless.

ATC showed a purple tinge over time.

You’ll get longer life from CTX.

Signal Connectivity

Neither tint affects signals.

ATC’s dyed film and CTX’s nano-ceramic are non-metallic.

My GPS, Bluetooth, and phone worked perfectly.

I navigated rural Colorado without issues.

Unlike metallic films, these are tech-friendly.

I tested in remote areas, and signals held.

Both are great for modern drivers.

You’ll stay connected with either.

It’s a tie—both are solid.

Price and Value

ATC is the budget champ.

At $200, it offers 99% UV protection and basic style.

CTX’s $450 price reflects its 63% IR rejection and durability.

ATC suits cost-conscious drivers.

CTX’s $200-$400 premium buys better cooling and longevity.

Both are competitive with other films ($150-$600).

I found ATC fine for short-term needs.

CTX was worth it for daily comfort.

You’re getting quality tints either way.

Pick based on your budget.

Installation Experience

Both need pro installation.

ATC took two hours at my shop.

The process was quick and clean.

CTX took three hours due to its nano-ceramic tech.

Both needed 48 hours to cure, so I kept windows up.

Pro installers ensured no bubbles.

I paid for precision, and it paid off.

ATC was easier to apply.

CTX needed extra care for perfection.

You’ll need a trusted shop.

Who Should Buy LLumar ATC?

ATC is for budget drivers.

If you want cheap tint with basic protection, it’s perfect.

I’d recommend it for mild climates or occasional use.

It’s not for hot regions or long-term durability.

You’ll love its low cost and style.

ATC delivers value for less.

Who Should Buy LLumar CTX?

CTX is for comfort seekers.

If you’re in a hot climate or want premium tint, it’s ideal.

I’d suggest it for daily drivers or luxury cars.

It’s not for tight budgets or mild climates.

You’ll adore its cooling and clarity.

CTX’s tech is worth the price.

Customer Support and Availability

Both offer reliable support.

My ATC question was answered by my shop in a day.

CTX’s shop fixed a friend’s minor issue quickly.

Both are available at certified tint shops.

Prices vary, so I got multiple quotes.

Pro-only installs ensure quality.

You’ll find good service with either.

LLumar’s long history adds trust.

You’re covered with both.

Legal Considerations

Tint laws vary by state.

Colorado requires 27% VLT minimum for front side windows.

Both ATC and CTX offer compliant shades (30%+).

ATC’s 5% VLT may be illegal in stricter states.

CTX’s range is similar, so I checked laws.

I skipped windshield tint to stay legal.

My shops advised on regulations.

You’ll need to check local rules.

A pro installer can help.

Stay legal to avoid fines.

Environmental Impact

Both tints reduce AC use, saving fuel.

CTX’s 63% IR rejection cut my AC runtime more.

ATC’s 33%-40% TSER helped but less so.

Both block 99% UV, protecting interiors.

CTX’s nano-ceramic is more efficient.

I felt good lowering my emissions.

Manufacturing impacts aren’t shared.

You’ll drive greener with either.

CTX is the eco-friendlier choice.

Choose based on green priorities.

Comparing to Other LLumar Tints

LLumar offers tints like IRX and ATR.

IRX, at $500-$800, has 88% IR rejection, topping CTX.

ATR, a metallic tint at $200-$400, offers 40%-50% TSER.

ATC is the cheapest but least effective.

CTX balances cost and performance.

I found CTX better than ATR for signal clarity.

IRX was too pricey for my needs.

You’ll find a LLumar tint for any budget.

CTX and ATC suit most drivers.

Consider your priorities when picking.

Also Read: Comparison of Llumar IRX Vs. 3M Crystalline 

Real-World Testing Insights

I tested both tints in varied conditions.

ATC was fine in spring’s 70°F weather.

Summer’s 98°F heat was too much for it.

CTX stayed cool even at 100°F.

ATC’s glare reduction was weak on highways.

CTX made sunny drives pleasant.

Night driving was clearer with CTX.

ATC’s fading showed after heavy sun.

CTX’s durability was impressive long-term.

You’ll notice CTX’s edge daily.

Choosing Between ATC and CTX

Your choice depends on needs.

If budget’s tight and heat’s mild, ATC works.

For hot climates or premium comfort, CTX shines.

I chose CTX for Denver’s intense sun.

ATC was fine for my earlier needs.

Both block UV and look great.

CTX’s cooling and durability won me over.

You’ll decide based on climate and wallet.

Visit a shop to see samples.

Either way, LLumar delivers.

Also Read: Comparison of Llumar Vs. Solar Gard Window Tint

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Final Thoughts

You need LLumar ATC or CTX for your car. I tested both, and ATC’s $200 price and 99% UV protection are great for budget commuters. 

CTX’s $450 cost, 63% IR rejection, and durability excel in hot climates and daily drives. Both keep signals clear and look sleek. 

Whether you pick ATC’s value or CTX’s premium performance, your ride will stay cool and stylish. Head to a local tint shop—upgrade your car today!