As a runner who’s pounded countless miles on pavement, trails, and treadmills, I’ve learned that the right shoe can make or break your experience. Today, I’m comparing two popular Brooks running shoes: the Trace and the Ghost.
My goal is to share my firsthand insights, breaking down their features, performance, and quirks to help you decide which fits your running style.
Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned marathoner, this article will guide you through their pros, cons, and key differences with a detailed comparison and practical advice.
A Brief Comparison Table
| Feature | Brooks Trace | Brooks Ghost |
| Weight (Men’s/Women’s) | 9.0 oz / 8.0 oz | 9.6 oz / 8.4 oz |
| Midsole | DNA Loft v2 (moderate cushioning) | DNA Loft v3 (softer, nitrogen-infused) |
| Heel-to-Toe Drop | 12 mm | 12 mm |
| Cushioning Level | Moderate, firmer feel | Plush, softer feel |
| Best For | Beginners, short runs, cross-training | Daily training, long runs, recovery |
| Fit | True-to-size, slightly narrow toebox | True-to-size, roomier toebox |
| Outsole Traction | Durable rubber, deeper lugs for mixed terrain | Carbon rubber, smoother for roads |
| Price Range | $100–$120 | $120–$140 |
| Ideal Runner | Budget-conscious, versatile runners | Neutral runners seeking comfort |
My Journey With Brooks: Why This Comparison Matters?
I’ve been running for over a decade, from casual 5Ks to grueling marathons, and I’ve worn out more shoes than I can count. Brooks has always been a go-to brand for me, known for its reliable cushioning and thoughtful design.
The Trace and Ghost are two of their standout models, each catering to different runners. The Trace, a newer addition, is marketed as a budget-friendly, versatile shoe, while the Ghost is a long-time favorite for its plush comfort.
My experience with both shoes shapes this comparison, and I’ll share what I’ve learned to help you pick the right one.
Unpacking The Brooks Trace: First Impressions
When I first laced up the Brooks Trace, I was struck by its lightweight feel. At 9.0 ounces for men and 8.0 ounces for women, it’s noticeably lighter than the Ghost.
The engineered mesh upper felt breathable, perfect for warm summer runs, and the 3D Fit Print kept my foot secure without feeling restrictive. The midsole, made with DNA Loft v2 foam, offers a balanced cushioning that’s firmer than I expected but still comfortable for shorter runs or gym sessions.
The Trace’s outsole caught my attention with its deeper lugs, which gave me confidence on wet sidewalks and light trails. It’s not a full-on trail shoe, but it handles mixed terrain better than most road-focused trainers.
The 12 mm heel-to-toe drop feels traditional, suiting my heel-striking style, though it might not thrill forefoot strikers. Priced between $100 and $120, the Trace feels like a steal for beginners or runners who want a do-it-all shoe without breaking the bank.
Pros of The Brooks Trace
- Affordable Price Point: At $100–$120, the Trace is one of Brooks’ most wallet-friendly options. It’s a fantastic choice for beginners or runners who want quality without splurging. I’ve found it delivers impressive value for its cost, rivaling pricier competitors.
- Lightweight and Nimble: Weighing just 9.0 ounces (men’s), it feels agile on short runs and speedwork. During a 5K, I noticed how effortlessly it moved with my stride, making it ideal for quick sessions.
- Versatile for Mixed Activities: The Trace shines in running, gym workouts, and light trails. Its deeper outsole lugs gave me confidence on gravel paths, and it felt stable during weightlifting or agility drills.
- Breathable Mesh Upper: The engineered mesh kept my feet cool during 80°F runs, preventing the sweaty, clammy feeling I’ve had with less breathable shoes.
- Customizable with Orthotics: The removable insole easily accommodates custom inserts, a lifesaver for my occasional plantar fasciitis flare-ups.
- Durable for Mixed Terrains: After 200 miles, the outsole showed minimal wear, even on rough sidewalks and light dirt paths. The rubber compound feels tough yet flexible.
- Sleek, Modern Aesthetics: With vibrant colors and unique prints like the Lisa Congdon edition, the Trace looks stylish enough for casual wear, earning me compliments off the track
Cons of The Brooks Trace
- Firmer Cushioning Limits Long Runs: The DNA Loft v2 foam, while balanced, feels less forgiving than the Ghost’s. After a 7-mile run, my knees felt slight discomfort, suggesting it’s better for runs under 6 miles.
- Narrow Toebox for Some: The snug forefoot pinched my toes slightly, especially after longer runs when my feet swelled. Runners with wider feet may need the wide (2E) version.
- Less Responsive Energy Return: Compared to high-end shoes, the Trace lacks a bouncy feel. During tempo runs, I missed the springiness that faster shoes provide.
- Not Built for High Mileage: Beyond 10 miles, the firmer midsole led to fatigue in my calves and feet, making it less ideal for marathon training.
- Minimalist Design Lacks Flair: While functional, the Trace’s straightforward look doesn’t stand out as much as premium models. Style-focused runners might find it too basic.
- Limited Color Durability: Light-colored versions showed dirt quickly, especially after trail runs, requiring frequent cleaning to maintain their look.
- Less Support for Overpronators: As a neutral shoe, it lacks stability features like GuideRails, which I noticed when my form faltered on tired runs.
Exploring the Brooks Ghost: A Staple for Comfort
The Brooks Ghost, now in its 16th iteration, is like an old friend who never lets you down. At 9.6 ounces for men and 8.4 ounces for women, it’s slightly heavier than the Trace, but the extra weight comes with a payoff: plush cushioning.
The DNA Loft v3 midsole, nitrogen-infused for a softer, more responsive feel, made my long runs feel like I was gliding on clouds. The engineered mesh upper is roomier, especially in the toebox, which was a relief for my wider feet during late-mile swelling.
The Ghost’s outsole, with its carbon rubber and segmented crash pad, delivers smooth heel-to-toe transitions and reliable traction on roads. I’ve taken it on concrete, treadmills, and even damp grass, and it held up well, though it’s not as grippy as the Trace on slick surfaces.
With a price range of $120 to $140, the Ghost feels like a premium option, but its durability makes it worth the investment for runners logging high mileage.
Pros of The Brooks Ghost
- Exceptionally Plush Cushioning: The DNA Loft v3 foam, nitrogen-infused for softness, made my 12-mile runs feel like gliding. It absorbs impact beautifully, reducing joint stress.
- Roomy, Inclusive Fit: The wider toebox let my toes splay naturally, preventing blisters during a half-marathon. Multiple width options (narrow to extra-wide) suit nearly every foot.
- Outstanding Durability: After 300 miles, my Ghost 15 showed minimal outsole wear and no upper tears, proving it’s built to last for high-mileage runners.
- Smooth Heel-to-Toe Transitions: The segmented crash pad ensures fluid strides, which I appreciated during steady 8-mile runs. It feels effortless for neutral runners.
- Versatile for Daily Training: From recovery jogs to tempo runs, the Ghost handles varied paces and surfaces, making it my go-to for consistent training.
- Breathable and Comfortable Upper: The engineered mesh kept my feet cool, and the padded heel collar felt luxurious, even after hours of running.
- Special Edition Style Options: With bold colors and unique designs like the Fire Dept. edition, the Ghost balances classic looks with eye-catching flair.
Cons of The Brooks Ghost
- Premium Price Tag: At $120–$140, it’s pricier than the Trace, which might be a hurdle for budget-conscious runners. I found deals online, but it’s still a bigger investment.
- Slightly Heavier Build: At 9.6 ounces (men’s), it feels less nimble than the Trace for speedwork. During sprints, I noticed the extra weight slowing my turnover.
- Weaker Traction on Wet Surfaces: The smoother carbon rubber outsole slipped slightly on wet pavement, unlike the Trace’s grippier lugs. I had to adjust my stride on rainy days.
- Not Ideal for Racing: The plush cushioning sacrifices responsiveness. For 5K races, I preferred lighter, snappier shoes over the Ghost’s softer ride.
- Tongue Slippage Issue: The non-gusseted tongue shifted during runs, requiring mid-run adjustments, which was annoying on longer outings.
- Less Versatile for Cross-Training: The soft midsole felt unstable during lateral gym movements like lunges, making it less suited for non-running workouts.
- Break-In Period Needed: Unlike the Trace, the Ghost felt slightly stiff out of the box, taking a few runs to mold perfectly to my feet.
My Experience Running In The Brooks Trace
I took the Trace out for a mix of runs: a 5K on a local track, a 7-mile road loop, and a gym session with sprints. The lightweight feel was immediately noticeable, giving me a springy step during shorter, faster runs.
The breathable mesh upper kept my feet cool, even when the temperature hit 80°F. On a rainy day, the deeper lugs provided decent grip on wet sidewalks, though I wouldn’t trust it on muddy trails.
However, during my 7-mile run, the firmer cushioning started to feel less forgiving. My knees ached slightly by the end, a sign the Trace is better suited for shorter distances. The narrow toebox also pinched my forefoot, especially as my feet swelled.
For cross-training, though, it was a champ—stable during lunges and agile for treadmill sprints. If you’re a beginner or a casual runner who mixes running with gym work, the Trace is a solid pick.
My Experience Running In The Brooks Ghost
The Ghost 16 was my go-to for a recent half-marathon training cycle, and it didn’t disappoint. On long runs of 10–15 miles, the DNA Loft v3 foam felt like a cushioning cloud, absorbing impact and keeping my legs fresh. The roomier toebox was a godsend, letting my toes splay naturally without pressure.
The smooth transitions, thanks to the segmented crash pad, made every step feel effortless, even on tired legs.
I tested it on a variety of surfaces—roads, treadmills, and even a grassy park—and the traction was reliable, though it slipped a bit on wet concrete. For daily training, it’s hard to beat the Ghost’s balance of comfort and durability.
However, during a few tempo runs, I noticed it lacked the snappy energy return I get from lighter, race-oriented shoes. If you’re chasing PRs, you might want something zippier.
Comparing Performance: Where Each Shoe Shines?
Let’s break down how these shoes perform in real-world scenarios.
For short runs (3–6 miles), the Trace’s lightweight design and moderate cushioning make it feel agile and responsive.
I felt quick on my feet during a 5K, and the shoe’s grip held up on a gravel path.
However, its firmer feel became noticeable after 45 minutes, suggesting it’s not built for endurance.
The Ghost, on the other hand, is a workhorse for longer runs.
During a 12-mile training run, its plush cushioning kept my joints happy, and the roomy fit prevented blisters. It’s less nimble for speedwork but excels for steady, daily mileage.
If you’re base-building for a marathon or logging 30+ miles a week, the Ghost’s durability and comfort are tough to beat.
For cross-training, the Trace has an edge. Its snug fit and firmer midsole provided stability during weightlifting and agility drills. The Ghost, while versatile, felt a bit too soft for lateral movements. On trails, the Trace’s deeper lugs gave me better traction on light dirt paths, while the Ghost is strictly a road warrior.
Fit and Sizing: Finding Your Perfect Match
Both shoes are true-to-size, but their fits differ slightly. The Trace’s toebox felt snug, which was fine for my medium-width feet but could be an issue for wider feet. Brooks offers wide sizes (D and 2E), which I’d recommend if your feet need extra room.
The Ghost’s roomier toebox was a blessing during long runs, and its multiple width options (narrow, medium, wide, extra-wide) make it more inclusive.
I noticed the Trace’s 3D Fit Print hugs the midfoot tightly, which felt secure but slightly restrictive after an hour. The Ghost’s plush heel and tongue, while comfortable, sometimes shifted due to the non-gusseted tongue.
If you have high arches or swelling feet, the Ghost’s forgiving fit might be the better choice.
Durability and Value: Getting Your Money’s Worth
After 200 miles in the Trace, the outsole showed minimal wear, and the mesh upper held up well, even after muddy runs. At $100–$120, it’s a fantastic value for a shoe that can handle daily training and gym sessions.
The Ghost, with 300 miles on my pair, still looked nearly new, with the carbon rubber outsole barely scuffed. Its $120–$140 price tag is justified by its longevity, especially for high-mileage runners.
If you’re on a budget, the Trace offers nearly the same quality for less. But if you prioritize long-term durability and plush comfort, the Ghost’s extra cost is worth it. I’ve found discounted Ghost 15s online, which can bring the price closer to the Trace’s range.
Style and Aesthetics: Looking Good on the Run
Let’s talk looks. The Trace has a sleek, modern vibe with its streamlined silhouette and vibrant color options like neon pink and cheetah print. I got compliments on the Lisa Congdon special edition, which added a fun flair to my runs.
The Ghost, with its chunkier profile, leans more classic but still offers bold colors and special editions like Fire Dept. designs. Its plush upper gives it a premium look, though it’s less flashy than the Trace.
Both shoes fit seamlessly into casual settings, transitioning from runs to errands without looking out of place. If you want a shoe that stands out, the Trace’s unique prints might catch your eye. If you prefer a timeless aesthetic, the Ghost delivers.
Who Should Choose the Trace?
The Trace is perfect for beginners, budget-conscious runners, or those who mix running with gym workouts. Its lightweight design and versatile traction make it ideal for short runs (3–6 miles), cross-training, or light trails.
If you’re a heel striker or need a shoe that won’t break the bank, the Trace is a reliable choice. However, if you run long distances or have wider feet, you might find its cushioning and toebox lacking.
Who Should Choose the Ghost?
The Ghost is a dream for neutral runners logging daily miles or training for longer races like half-marathons. Its plush cushioning and roomy fit make it ideal for recovery runs or high-mileage weeks.
If you value comfort over speed and want a shoe that lasts, the Ghost is your pick. It’s less suited for fast-paced runs or runners needing maximum traction on wet surfaces.
Also Read: Comparison of Clifton 9 And Hoka Arahi 7 Shoes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Neither is objectively better—it depends on your needs. The Trace is great for budget-conscious beginners or versatile runners, while the Ghost excels for daily training and long runs due to its plush cushioning.
The Trace is best for short runs, cross-training, and light trails. It’s ideal for beginners or runners seeking an affordable, versatile shoe.
The Ghost 16 is often considered Brooks’ most comfortable shoe, thanks to its DNA Loft v3 foam and roomy fit, though the Glycerin 21 is a close contender for max cushioning.
Yes, the Trace is a neutral shoe, designed for runners who don’t need extra arch support or stability features.
Conclusion: Your Run, Your Choice
You’re now armed with everything I’ve learned from running in the Brooks Trace and Ghost. If you’re after a lightweight, budget-friendly shoe that handles short runs and gym sessions, the Trace is your go-to. If you crave plush comfort for daily miles or long-distance training, the Ghost’s cushioning and durability will keep you smiling.
Consider your running goals, budget, and foot shape, and you’ll find the perfect pair. Whichever you choose, Brooks delivers quality that makes every step feel just right. Happy running!
