As a runner who’s logged countless miles, I’ve worn out more shoes than I care to count, but few have earned my loyalty like Brooks. The Brooks Ghost and Adrenaline are two of their most iconic models, each with a devoted following.
In this article, I’ll compare the Ghost 17 and Adrenaline GTS 24, sharing my firsthand experiences to help you decide which shoe fits your running style. I’ll break down their features, pros, and cons, ensuring you have all the info to pick the perfect pair for your next run.
A Brief Comparison Table
Feature | Brooks Ghost 17 | Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 |
Shoe Type | Neutral | Stability |
Weight (Men’s US 9) | 9.8 oz | 10.0 oz |
Heel-to-Toe Drop | 12 mm | 12 mm |
Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 (Nitrogen-infused) | DNA Loft v3 (Nitrogen-infused) |
Stack Height (Heel/Forefoot) | 37 mm / 25 mm | 39 mm / 27 mm |
Stability Features | None (Neutral) | GuideRails Support System |
Upper Material | Engineered Air Mesh | Engineered Air Mesh |
Outsole | Hard rubber (heel), blown rubber (forefoot/midfoot) | Hard rubber (heel), blown rubber (forefoot/midfoot) |
Best For | Neutral runners, versatile daily training | Overpronators, runners needing stability |
Price (USD) | ~$140 | ~$140 |
Fit | True-to-size, slightly wider forefoot | True-to-size, slightly snugger midfoot |
Durability | Moderate | Moderate |
Breathability | High | High |
Traction | Excellent (wet/dry surfaces) | Excellent (wet/dry surfaces) |
My Journey With Brooks
I’ve been running for over a decade, from casual 5Ks to grueling marathons, and Brooks has been a constant companion. My first pair was a Ghost 10, and I instantly fell for its plush comfort.
Later, when knee pain crept in during a half-marathon training cycle, a running store recommended the Adrenaline GTS. The switch was a game-changer, and since then, I’ve alternated between the two depending on my needs.
Both shoes have unique strengths, and my experiences with them shape this comparison. Let’s explore what makes each stand out and where they fall short.
Understanding The Brooks Ghost 17
The Brooks Ghost 17 is the latest in a line that’s been a favorite since 2008. It’s a neutral running shoe, meaning it’s designed for runners whose feet don’t excessively roll inward or outward during their stride.
I slipped into the Ghost 17 for a month of testing, covering everything from easy 3-mile jogs to 10-mile long runs on pavement and treadmills.
Key Features of The Ghost 17

The Ghost 17 boasts a nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole, which feels soft yet responsive.
I noticed it’s slightly softer than its predecessor, the Ghost 16, thanks to an extra 2 mm of foam in the forefoot.
This makes it ideal for midfoot and forefoot strikers like me, who land closer to the toes.
The shoe weighs 9.8 ounces (men’s US 9), lighter than many competitors, and has a 12 mm heel-to-toe drop, which suits heel strikers too.
The upper is made of engineered air mesh, offering a secure yet breathable fit. I ran in humid summer conditions, and my feet stayed cool and dry.
The outsole combines hard rubber in the heel for durability and softer blown rubber in the forefoot for flexibility.
Traction was reliable on wet roads and dry trails, though the rubber isn’t as durable as some premium brands.
Pros of The Ghost 17
- Unmatched Versatility for All Workouts: The Ghost 17 is like that reliable friend who’s up for anything. I wore it for short 3-mile jogs, 10-mile long runs, and even a HIIT class at the gym, and it handled every scenario with ease. During a 5K tempo run, the shoe’s responsiveness kept me cruising at a 7:30 pace without feeling sluggish, while its cushioning made recovery runs feel like a treat. It’s also great for casual walks—I wore it for a 10,000-step day exploring a city, and my feet stayed comfortable.
- Lightweight Yet Plush Comfort: Weighing just 9.8 ounces, the Ghost 17 feels nimble compared to other daily trainers. The DNA Loft v3 foam is a standout—soft enough to absorb the impact of pounding pavement but firm enough to avoid that sinking feeling. On an 8-mile run with rolling hills, my legs felt fresh, and the lightweight design made climbing easier than expected.
- Top-Notch Breathability: The engineered air mesh upper is a godsend for hot runs. During an 80°F, humid 6-mile run, my feet stayed cool and dry, with no hotspots or sweaty discomfort. This is a huge plus for summer runners or anyone prone to blisters in warmer conditions.
- Silky-Smooth Transitions: The segmented crash pad makes every step feel fluid. I ran on concrete paths for 10 miles, and the heel-to-toe roll was seamless, with no jarring impacts. The 12 mm drop suits my midfoot strike perfectly, but it’s also forgiving for heel strikers, ensuring a natural stride.
- Accommodating Fit for Most Feet: Available in multiple widths, the Ghost 17 caters to a range of foot shapes. My narrow feet felt secure in the medium width, with a roomy forefoot that let my toes splay naturally during long runs. A friend with wider feet tried the wide version and raved about the lack of pinching, even after 12 miles.
- Stylish Design: Brooks nailed the aesthetics with vibrant color options. My Estate Blue pair drew compliments at my running club, and the sleek, modern look feels versatile enough for both workouts and casual outings.
Cons of The Ghost 17
- Limited Support for Overpronators: As a neutral shoe, the Ghost 17 doesn’t offer stability features for runners who overpronate. During a 12-mile run, I noticed slight ankle fatigue, likely due to my mild overpronation not being addressed. If your feet roll inward excessively, this shoe might lead to discomfort or even minor injuries over time, especially on longer runs.
- Moderate Durability Concerns: After logging 100 miles, I saw visible wear on the blown rubber in the forefoot, with some tread smoothing out. The hard rubber heel held up better, but the softer sections don’t match the longevity of premium outsoles from brands like Saucony or New Balance. You’ll likely get 300–350 miles, which is decent but not outstanding for the price.
- Not Optimized for Speedwork: The Ghost 17 is a daily trainer, not a speed demon. During a track session with 400-meter repeats at a 6:30 pace, it felt adequate but lacked the snappy, propulsive feel of a racing shoe. If you’re chasing personal bests or doing regular speedwork, you’ll want a lighter, more responsive option.
- Slightly Soft for Firm-Feel Fans: The DNA Loft v3 foam is plush, which I love, but it can feel too soft for runners who prefer a firmer, more grounded ride. During a fast 5-mile run, I noticed a slight energy loss at toe-off, which might frustrate those who want a more dynamic response.
Exploring The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24

The Adrenaline GTS 24, part of a lineage dating back to 1996, is Brooks’ flagship stability shoe. Its GuideRails technology sets it apart, designed to curb overpronation by guiding the foot into proper alignment.
I tested it over a month, using it for recovery runs, long runs, and even some trail jaunts.
Key Features of The Adrenaline GTS 24
Like the Ghost 17, the Adrenaline GTS 24 uses DNA Loft v3 cushioning, but it’s slightly firmer to prioritize stability. It weighs 10.0 ounces (men’s US 9), just a touch heavier than the Ghost, with the same 12 mm drop.
The GuideRails system, a soft center with firm sidewalls, supports the arch and reduces excess shin and heel rotation. I found this particularly helpful during long runs when fatigue sets in.
The upper is also engineered air mesh, nearly identical to the Ghost’s, ensuring breathability and a secure fit.
The outsole mirrors the Ghost’s design, with hard rubber in the heel and blown rubber in the forefoot, offering excellent traction. I tested it on slick pavement after rain, and it gripped confidently.
Pros of The Adrenaline GTS 24
- Outstanding Stability: The GuideRails system is a game-changer for overpronators like me. During a 15-mile run, it kept my ankles aligned, preventing the inward roll that often causes knee pain. A running buddy with flat feet said it transformed their training, reducing shin splints significantly.
- Balanced Cushioning: The DNA Loft v3 foam, while firmer than the Ghost’s, offers a supportive yet comfortable ride. On a 12-mile run, I felt cushioned without sacrificing stability, making it ideal for long distances where form can falter.
- Reliable Traction: The outsole performs flawlessly on varied surfaces. I ran on wet pavement and gravel trails, and the grip never faltered. Even on a muddy park path, the shoe provided enough traction to keep me steady.
- Breathable and Secure Upper: The air mesh upper kept my feet cool during a sweaty 10-mile run in 75°F weather. The structured design, paired with GuideRails, locked my foot in place without feeling constrictive, even on longer runs.
- Eco-Friendly Materials: With nearly 60% recycled materials in the upper, the Adrenaline aligns with my values as an environmentally conscious runner. It’s a small but meaningful step toward sustainability in running gear.
- Confidence on Long Runs: The stability and support gave me peace of mind during marathon training. I wore it for a 16-mile run and finished without the usual aches, a testament to its design for endurance runners.
Cons of The Adrenaline GTS 24
- Slightly Heavier Feel: At 10.0 ounces, the Adrenaline feels marginally bulkier than the Ghost. During a 5K tempo run, I noticed the extra weight, especially when trying to hit faster splits. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it’s less nimble for speedwork.
- Snug Midfoot Fit: The GuideRails create a snugger midfoot, which felt secure for my narrow feet but could be restrictive for runners with high arches or wider feet. A friend with wider feet found it slightly tight, even in the medium width.
- Less Versatile for Non-Running Activities: While great for running, the Adrenaline’s stability-focused design felt stiff during gym workouts. I tried it for a HIIT session, and the firmness hindered lateral movements compared to the Ghost’s flexibility.
- Moderate Durability: Like the Ghost, the blown rubber in the forefoot showed wear after 100 miles. It’s durable enough for 300–350 miles, but don’t expect it to outlast premium outsoles. The heel’s hard rubber held up better, but overall longevity is average.
- Not Ideal for Speed: The Adrenaline prioritizes stability over responsiveness. During sprint intervals, I felt it lacked the bounce needed for quick turnover, making it less suitable for track sessions or races.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Brooks Ghost And Adrenaline Shoes

- Cushioning and Comfort
Both shoes use Brooks’ DNA Loft v3 foam, but their feel differs. The Ghost 17’s cushioning is softer and more responsive, ideal for runners who prioritize a plush ride. During a 6-mile run, I felt like I was gliding, with the foam absorbing impact effortlessly.
The Adrenaline GTS 24, while still cushioned, is firmer due to its stability focus. It’s less “cloud-like” but offers a grounded feel, which I appreciated on longer runs when maintaining form was crucial. If you love a softer ride, the Ghost wins; if you need support, the Adrenaline takes the lead.
- Stability and Support
The Adrenaline GTS 24 is the clear winner for stability. Its GuideRails system kept my stride in check, especially during a 10-mile run when fatigue caused my form to slip. I recommended it to a friend with flat feet, and they reported less knee pain after switching.
The Ghost 17, while stable for a neutral shoe, doesn’t match the Adrenaline’s corrective support. If you overpronate or have ankle instability, the Adrenaline is your go-to. Neutral runners, however, will find the Ghost’s balance sufficient.
- Fit and Sizing
Both shoes run true-to-size, but their fit varies slightly. The Ghost 17 has a wider forefoot, which I loved for toe splay during long runs. My size 9.5 medium fit perfectly, with no rubbing.
The Adrenaline GTS 24 feels snugger in the midfoot due to the GuideRails, which some runners might find restrictive. I have narrow feet, so it worked for me, but those with wider feet might prefer the Ghost or opt for a wide size. Brooks’ sizing tip—going half a size up from dress shoes—is spot-on for both.
- Durability and Traction
The outsole design is nearly identical, with hard rubber in the heel and blown rubber in the forefoot. Both offer excellent traction on wet and dry surfaces—I never slipped, even on slick sidewalks. However, the blown rubber wears faster than premium rubbers from brands like Saucony.
After 100 miles, both shoes showed moderate wear, suggesting a lifespan of 300–400 miles. If durability is a priority, neither stands out as exceptional, but they’re solid for the price.
- Weight and Performance
The Ghost 17’s 9.8-ounce weight gives it a slight edge for faster runs. I felt nimble during a 5K, though it’s not a racing shoe.
The Adrenaline GTS 24, at 10.0 ounces, feels slightly heavier, which I noticed during tempo runs. For recovery or long runs, the difference is negligible, but the Ghost’s lighter feel makes it more versatile for varied paces.
- Best Use Cases
The Ghost 17 shines as an all-around daily trainer. I used it for everything from short jogs to marathon-paced long runs, and it never felt out of place. Its versatility makes it ideal for beginners or runners who want one shoe for multiple activities.
The Adrenaline GTS 24, with its GuideRails, is best for runners needing stability, especially overpronators or those with knee pain. I found it excelled on long runs and recovery days, where support trumped speed.
My Personal Experience

Testing these shoes was a journey of rediscovery.
The Ghost 17 felt like slipping into an old favorite—light, cushioned, and ready for anything.
I wore it for a 10-mile run along a riverfront path, and the smooth transitions kept me comfortable even as my legs tired.
The Adrenaline GTS 24, however, was my savior during a 15-mile run when my form started to falter.
The GuideRails kept my ankles aligned, and I finished without the usual knee twinge.
My preference leans toward the Ghost for its versatility, but the Adrenaline’s stability won me over for longer efforts.
Who Should Choose The Ghost 17?
If you’re a neutral runner or don’t overpronate, the Ghost 17 is a fantastic choice. Its balanced cushioning and lightweight design make it ideal for:
- Beginners mixing walking and running.
- Runners seeking a versatile daily trainer for short to moderate distances.
- Those who prioritize a soft, responsive ride over corrective support.
I’d recommend it for anyone who wants a reliable, comfortable shoe that handles various workouts without fuss. If you’re unsure about your pronation, try it at a running store to confirm it suits your gait.
Who Should Choose The Adrenaline GTS 24?
The Adrenaline GTS 24 is tailored for runners needing stability, particularly:
- Overpronators or those with flat feet.
- Runners with knee pain or ankle instability.
- Long-distance runners who need support to maintain form.
I suggested it to a client training for a half-marathon who struggled with knee pain, and they noticed a difference within weeks. If stability is your priority, this shoe delivers without sacrificing comfort.
Additional Considerations Before Buying Brooks Ghost And Adrenaline Shoes
- Price and Value: Both shoes retail around $140, a fair price for their quality. The Ghost 17 offers versatility for the cost, while the Adrenaline GTS 24 justifies its price with specialized stability features. I’ve found Brooks’ durability consistent, giving you 300–400 miles per pair, making them a solid investment.
- Environmental Impact: The Adrenaline GTS 24 stands out with its 60% recycled upper, appealing to eco-conscious runners. The Ghost 17 also uses sustainable materials, though Brooks doesn’t specify the percentage. If sustainability matters to you, the Adrenaline has a slight edge.
- Aesthetic and Color Options: Brooks is known for vibrant designs, and both shoes deliver. The Ghost 17 comes in bold hues like Estate Blue, while the Adrenaline GTS 24 offers fun patterns. I chose a sleek black Adrenaline and a white Ghost, both of which looked sharp. Aesthetics are subjective, but Brooks gives you plenty of choices.
Also Read: Comparison of Hoka Clifton 9 And Mach 6 Shoes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Neither is inherently better—it depends on your needs. The Ghost 17 is ideal for neutral runners seeking versatility and a soft ride, while the Adrenaline GTS 24 excels for overpronators needing stability. Test both to see what feels right.
The Adrenaline GTS 24 is best for runners with flat feet or overpronation, as its GuideRails system supports proper alignment and reduces strain on knees and ankles.
The Ghost 17 is better for walking due to its lighter weight and softer cushioning, offering a more flexible, comfortable stride. The Adrenaline works but feels firmer.
Both use DNA Loft v3 foam, but the Ghost’s cushioning is softer and more responsive, ideal for neutral runners. The Adrenaline’s is firmer, prioritizing stability for overpronators.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between the Brooks Ghost 17 and Adrenaline GTS 24 boils down to your running needs. If you’re like me and value a versatile, cushioned shoe for varied runs, the Ghost 17 is your match. Its lightweight feel and smooth ride make every mile enjoyable.
But if you overpronate or need extra stability, the Adrenaline GTS 24 is your best bet, offering support that keeps you aligned and pain-free. You can’t go wrong with either—just lace up, hit the road, and let your feet decide.
Visit a running store to try them on, and you’ll find the perfect pair for your stride.